Finished reading Everyman
by Phillip Roth, a little slip of a book. It was my first Roth and I was blown away by the precision and economy
of the prose. It was just magnificent. In all honesty, the content – the story, the
character – didn’t propel me greatly, I was just seduced by the language over
and over again. What I really want to
read now is American Pastoral, which
I understand to be written in the same, spare “late Roth” style, but which
sounds somehow meatier.
This was a book club book, so I’m really curious to see how people
respond to it. Our book club discussions
are very driven by the story: Did you like this character? Did you understand his actions? What do you think he was getting at when he
said such and such? It’s a really fun
way of talking about books, and not always one I’m used to. I wonder how it will apply to a work like
this, where the protagonist is drawn with such purposeful ambiguity. There is no question that we feel empathy for
him as a reader, but we don’t necessarily like him. I'm not sure how he'll go over, our Everyman.